Direct Fired vs. Indirect Fired Absorption Chillers: Which Fits Your Infrastructure?

Direct Fired vs. Indirect Fired Absorption Chillers: Which Fits Your Infrastructure?

Jan 27, 2026
8 min read
Energy & Industrial Efficiency

Direct Fired vs. Indirect Fired Absorption Chillers: Which Fits Your Infrastructure?


Choosing an absorption cooling solution depends on your facility's energy sources, infrastructure, and operational priorities. Both direct-fired and indirect-fired VAM chillers produce chilled water using thermal energy rather than electricity, but their energy paths differ significantly.

Understanding the Core Difference πŸ”

Chiller Type How It Works Energy Flow
Direct-Fired VAM Burner integrated in chiller. Natural gas, diesel, or fuel oil combusted inside the unit. Fuel β†’ Direct combustion β†’ Heat β†’ Absorption cycle β†’ Chilled water
Indirect-Fired VAM Receives heat from external source: steam, hot water, or exhaust gases. Fuel β†’ External equipment β†’ Steam/Hot water/Exhaust β†’ Absorption cycle β†’ Chilled water

Infrastructure Requirements Comparison πŸ—οΈ

Requirement Direct-Fired Indirect-Fired
External Heat SourceNot requiredRequired (boiler, generator, process heat)
Fuel SupplyGas line or diesel tankDepends on heat source
Steam PipingNoneRequired for steam systems
Exhaust DuctingSimple flue stackComplex for exhaust recovery
Combustion AirRequiredNot required
Space RequirementsCompact, single unitDistributed (heat source + chiller)
Environmental PermitsCombustion permits requiredMay not need if using existing source

When Direct-Fired Makes Perfect Sense πŸ”₯

  • New facilities without steam infrastructure: Avoid boiler cost (β‚Ή80 lakhs–1.2 cr).
  • Commercial buildings (hotels, hospitals, offices).
  • Grid-constrained areas with gas access.
  • District cooling plants with large central capacity.

When Indirect-Fired Excels ♻️

  • Facilities with existing steam infrastructure.
  • Waste heat recovery applications.
  • Combined Cooling, Heating & Power (CCHP).
  • Industrial plants with multiple heat sources.

Efficiency & Performance ⚑

Chiller Type COP Fuel & Flexibility
Direct-Fired1.20–1.35Natural gas, LPG, diesel, dual-fuel
Indirect-Fired0.70–1.35Steam, hot water, exhaust heat

Capital Cost (500 TR System) πŸ’°

Chiller Type Equipment Aux & Installation Total CAPEX
Direct-Fired VAM β‚Ή6.5–7.5 cr + gas train β‚Ή0.4–0.6 cr β‚Ή1.5–2 cr β‚Ή8.5–10.1 cr
Indirect-Fired Steam VAM β‚Ή3.2–3.8 cr + steam integration β‚Ή0.4–0.8 cr β‚Ή1.8–2.2 cr β‚Ή5.4–6.8 cr

Operating Cost Reality 🏭

  • Direct-Fired: Fuel dominates cost; best where fuel cheaper than electricity.
  • Indirect-Fired Waste Heat: Lowest operating cost.
  • Indirect-Fired Steam: Higher cost unless high-pressure steam is free/available.

Decision Framework βœ…

  • Choose Direct-Fired: No steam/waste heat, gas available, commercial buildings.
  • Choose Indirect-Fired: Steam/waste heat available, CCHP, industrial plants.
  • Hybrid: Indirect base load + direct-fired peak load.

πŸ’‘ Need Help Choosing the Right Absorption Chiller?

BROAD India's engineers can guide you based on your heat sources and infrastructure.

Broad India
FacebookInstagramYouTubeLinkedIn

Links

Contact Us

BROAD Air Conditioning India Pvt. Ltd. (BROAD India) is a subsidiary of BROAD Group.

Powered by

WictroniX
Direct Fired vs. Indirect Fired Absorption Chillers: Which Fits Your Infrastructure?