Direct Fired vs. Indirect Fired Absorption Chillers: Which Fits Your Infrastructure?
Choosing an absorption cooling solution depends on your facility's energy sources, infrastructure, and operational priorities. Both direct-fired and indirect-fired VAM chillers produce chilled water using thermal energy rather than electricity, but their energy paths differ significantly.
Understanding the Core Difference π
| Chiller Type |
How It Works |
Energy Flow |
| Direct-Fired VAM |
Burner integrated in chiller. Natural gas, diesel, or fuel oil combusted inside the unit. |
Fuel β Direct combustion β Heat β Absorption cycle β Chilled water |
| Indirect-Fired VAM |
Receives heat from external source: steam, hot water, or exhaust gases. |
Fuel β External equipment β Steam/Hot water/Exhaust β Absorption cycle β Chilled water |
Infrastructure Requirements Comparison ποΈ
| Requirement |
Direct-Fired |
Indirect-Fired |
| External Heat Source | Not required | Required (boiler, generator, process heat) |
| Fuel Supply | Gas line or diesel tank | Depends on heat source |
| Steam Piping | None | Required for steam systems |
| Exhaust Ducting | Simple flue stack | Complex for exhaust recovery |
| Combustion Air | Required | Not required |
| Space Requirements | Compact, single unit | Distributed (heat source + chiller) |
| Environmental Permits | Combustion permits required | May not need if using existing source |
When Direct-Fired Makes Perfect Sense π₯
- New facilities without steam infrastructure: Avoid boiler cost (βΉ80 lakhsβ1.2 cr).
- Commercial buildings (hotels, hospitals, offices).
- Grid-constrained areas with gas access.
- District cooling plants with large central capacity.
When Indirect-Fired Excels β»οΈ
- Facilities with existing steam infrastructure.
- Waste heat recovery applications.
- Combined Cooling, Heating & Power (CCHP).
- Industrial plants with multiple heat sources.
Efficiency & Performance β‘
| Chiller Type |
COP |
Fuel & Flexibility |
| Direct-Fired | 1.20β1.35 | Natural gas, LPG, diesel, dual-fuel |
| Indirect-Fired | 0.70β1.35 | Steam, hot water, exhaust heat |
Capital Cost (500 TR System) π°
| Chiller Type |
Equipment |
Aux & Installation |
Total CAPEX |
| Direct-Fired VAM |
βΉ6.5β7.5 cr + gas train βΉ0.4β0.6 cr |
βΉ1.5β2 cr |
βΉ8.5β10.1 cr |
| Indirect-Fired Steam VAM |
βΉ3.2β3.8 cr + steam integration βΉ0.4β0.8 cr |
βΉ1.8β2.2 cr |
βΉ5.4β6.8 cr |
Operating Cost Reality π
- Direct-Fired: Fuel dominates cost; best where fuel cheaper than electricity.
- Indirect-Fired Waste Heat: Lowest operating cost.
- Indirect-Fired Steam: Higher cost unless high-pressure steam is free/available.
Decision Framework β
- Choose Direct-Fired: No steam/waste heat, gas available, commercial buildings.
- Choose Indirect-Fired: Steam/waste heat available, CCHP, industrial plants.
- Hybrid: Indirect base load + direct-fired peak load.
π‘ Need Help Choosing the Right Absorption Chiller?
BROAD India's engineers can guide you based on your heat sources and infrastructure.